Featured

Discussion of “The Vitamin Myth” by Paul Offit

Hello again!

In reading Paul Offit’s article “The Vitamin Myth: Why We Think We Need Supplements” I was shocked to find that the root of the incorrect notion that we constantly need to take vitamins to supplement our diets stemmed from a man whose other contributions to science were paramount. Linus Pauling, who made exceptional discoveries in the fields of chemistry, biochemistry, and as a peace activist was a legend in academia, and every pre-medical student is well accustomed to learning his name and being tested on his discoveries. For this reason, it is shocking to see his name associated with believing bogus information not supported by significant data and, even worse, preaching its validity.

In his article, Paul Offit discusses the multitude of studies that argue against the need for vitamins and go further as to discuss their negative consequences. An example I found incredibly notable includes the male prostate cancer study in 2011 that found that those receiving vitamin E had a 17% greater risk of prostate cancer. In addition, there are a multitude of studies that analyze the positive correlation between the use of dietary supplements and an increased risk for cancer and heart disease.

What interests me is how despite all of the new findings, people will still believe what was put out there by Linus Pauling. This reality is the result of many different interconnecting factors, with one of the most important being the popularization of information for hype rather than the true medical benefit of others. Therefore, just like with the false study that vaccines lead to autism, these statements have been so overly circulated internally among people and communities that it becomes difficult to alter their beliefs.

Also astonishing to me is the fact that the vitamin industry is not fearful of the fact that data goes against what they have been advertising, and know that their profit margin will remain unscathed. Even despite there even being an article on the Wall Street Journal in opposition to their use, the nutraceutical industries knew that all that they had to do was “ride them out.” There are a multitude of reasons that this may occur. These include, but are not limited to, the fact that there is a very large element to medical well-being that comes with the mental belief that one’s health is improving. This has been shown time and time again with tests on the placebo effect in a wide array of studies. Another reason may be that because of this foundation for growth, their consumption has become entrenched in familial tradition.

In my opinion, I also believe that there is a factor of responsibility associated with parental purchasing these for their families. They may know that the data argue against them, but the possibility that they might be beneficial, and since the side effects are not acute, they see the short-term potential benefits as outweighing the long-term negative consequences.

I was hoping to attach some links that discuss possible reasons for an inability to renounce this belief, but not many writers expand their discussion to this. I was also searching for statistical figures that show the frequencies of these beliefs, especially across different social/ethnic groups, which could help in the narrowing down to find the most likely reasons. Below is a link that includes such figures, and shows that the main group who employs their use is those of white ethnicity. Although the statistics on their use may be in circulation, strong conclusions on the ways to eradicate the false notions have yet to be drawn.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db61.htm

Featured

About me

Be yourself; Everyone else is already taken.

— Oscar Wilde.

The debate whether nature or nurture have a greater influence on the resultant identity of a person is frequently heatedly contested in my head. Since as of yet nothing I have learned has tipped the scale from one side to another, this exactly is where my opinion also resides; in the balanced center. I am a firm believer that we are the product of our own environment, with every interaction, relationship, and experience contributing its own to our person. However, it is our internal identity from the time of birth that predisposes us to respond in a defining way to whatever our environment may throw at us.

From a young age I was a very curious child, always wanting to understand how things worked, and my favorite thing to do was to borrow books from the library and build scientific experiments with my friends (my mother’s least favorite of which was undoubtedly the sedimentary worm farm.) I was also always obsessed with rescuing animals, much to the dismay of my father, and relished in the feeling of accomplishment I got in caring for them. My family often regarded me with a curious eye, since the normal gender defined toys were definitely not of interest to me—I always enjoyed working with constituents of nature, and would absolutely adore receiving dissection kits as gifts. My father often tells me how him and my mother saw my peculiarity shine through in certain instances, such as when in elementary school I distinguished to them who I deemed as my true friends, with the remainder of my classmates being regarded as acquaintances.

What I draw from the observations made by my family is that from early on I have always had a strong sense of individuality. I can depend on others when part of a team, but I am not instinctively dependent. As I matured I grew an intellectual curiosity for how people’s minds worked (which eventually led me to choose my major as Neuroscience) including attempting to decipher why much of the males in my family regarded my behavior as antipathetic, while for their sons they would see it as a favorable trait. This led me to have to establish a version of my sociological self that I conveyed to them as per what was expected of me, and consequently led to me to a self-awareness of my true personality.

My nature was further cultivated by the subtly misogynistic environment in which I was raised. Throughout high school I spent a great deal of time doing rotations with my father, a neonatologist, in the hospital, and I fell in love with the medical sciences. I often began conversations with the mothers once they were in postnatal care, and after hearing my intellectual interests, they always urged me to not let myself end up in their shoes before establishing myself financially through my own merit. It was not uncommon for them to be single and with only familial support in the room, and they would always love when I gave them a hopeful smile and told them to remember that they had dormant “girl power” within them that was waiting to be unleashed. My father often enjoyed bringing me in to lighten the mood in the room along with being able to teach me his trade, since I am the youngest of four and the first of which to love medicine.

My investment in learning of the science underlying parturition is what led me to become part of an almost six-month research project at the University of South Florida (USF) studying macrophage migration in the inflammatory response caused by necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), which I later went on to become a published author of and present at two medical conferences. The most awe­inspiring thing I learned that summer was the ability to use ferromagnetic bead sorting in the isolation of macrophages from the bone marrow, a technique I never would have imagined would be possible to perform manually. I also peculiarly leaned much from the language barrier between my co­workers and I, given that many of them were of Indian descent. Since scientific words are not the easiest to convey among cultures, communication many times had to be performed through drawings and demonstrations, and also google. I become adept at coming to my own conclusions and answering questions through my own independent research if necessary. While my fellow classmates thought I was such an overkill, I was having the time of my life, with my childhood scientific fascinations completely unleashed.

My natural genetic endowment from the strong-willed women in my family, in addition to the experiences I have been privileged to have throughout my life, have led me to develop an incredibly strong passion in caring for others. Until his death in recent years, I partially lived with my grandparents so that I contribute my strength in caring for my grandpa. While others felt most accomplished though alternative after-school activities, in my heart being where I was just felt the most suitable. Through my observations I have come to the conclusion that confidence often stems from feeling as if you have control of your destiny. Consequently, I know I would I would revel in having the opportunity to play my strengths and be there for women to make them feel like the most confident versions of themselves so they can achieve their fullest potential. Many women in STEM have coached me to be the strong-willed woman I am today, and my life will have come full circle when I am able to do the same.

Introduce Yourself (Example Post)

This is an example post, originally published as part of Blogging University. Enroll in one of our ten programs, and start your blog right.

You’re going to publish a post today. Don’t worry about how your blog looks. Don’t worry if you haven’t given it a name yet, or you’re feeling overwhelmed. Just click the “New Post” button, and tell us why you’re here.

Why do this?

  • Because it gives new readers context. What are you about? Why should they read your blog?
  • Because it will help you focus you own ideas about your blog and what you’d like to do with it.

The post can be short or long, a personal intro to your life or a bloggy mission statement, a manifesto for the future or a simple outline of your the types of things you hope to publish.

To help you get started, here are a few questions:

  • Why are you blogging publicly, rather than keeping a personal journal?
  • What topics do you think you’ll write about?
  • Who would you love to connect with via your blog?
  • If you blog successfully throughout the next year, what would you hope to have accomplished?

You’re not locked into any of this; one of the wonderful things about blogs is how they constantly evolve as we learn, grow, and interact with one another — but it’s good to know where and why you started, and articulating your goals may just give you a few other post ideas.

Can’t think how to get started? Just write the first thing that pops into your head. Anne Lamott, author of a book on writing we love, says that you need to give yourself permission to write a “crappy first draft”. Anne makes a great point — just start writing, and worry about editing it later.

When you’re ready to publish, give your post three to five tags that describe your blog’s focus — writing, photography, fiction, parenting, food, cars, movies, sports, whatever. These tags will help others who care about your topics find you in the Reader. Make sure one of the tags is “zerotohero,” so other new bloggers can find you, too.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started