Hello again!
In reading Paul Offit’s article “The Vitamin Myth: Why We Think We Need Supplements” I was shocked to find that the root of the incorrect notion that we constantly need to take vitamins to supplement our diets stemmed from a man whose other contributions to science were paramount. Linus Pauling, who made exceptional discoveries in the fields of chemistry, biochemistry, and as a peace activist was a legend in academia, and every pre-medical student is well accustomed to learning his name and being tested on his discoveries. For this reason, it is shocking to see his name associated with believing bogus information not supported by significant data and, even worse, preaching its validity.
In his article, Paul Offit discusses the multitude of studies that argue against the need for vitamins and go further as to discuss their negative consequences. An example I found incredibly notable includes the male prostate cancer study in 2011 that found that those receiving vitamin E had a 17% greater risk of prostate cancer. In addition, there are a multitude of studies that analyze the positive correlation between the use of dietary supplements and an increased risk for cancer and heart disease.
What interests me is how despite all of the new findings, people will still believe what was put out there by Linus Pauling. This reality is the result of many different interconnecting factors, with one of the most important being the popularization of information for hype rather than the true medical benefit of others. Therefore, just like with the false study that vaccines lead to autism, these statements have been so overly circulated internally among people and communities that it becomes difficult to alter their beliefs.
Also astonishing to me is the fact that the vitamin industry is not fearful of the fact that data goes against what they have been advertising, and know that their profit margin will remain unscathed. Even despite there even being an article on the Wall Street Journal in opposition to their use, the nutraceutical industries knew that all that they had to do was “ride them out.” There are a multitude of reasons that this may occur. These include, but are not limited to, the fact that there is a very large element to medical well-being that comes with the mental belief that one’s health is improving. This has been shown time and time again with tests on the placebo effect in a wide array of studies. Another reason may be that because of this foundation for growth, their consumption has become entrenched in familial tradition.
In my opinion, I also believe that there is a factor of responsibility associated with parental purchasing these for their families. They may know that the data argue against them, but the possibility that they might be beneficial, and since the side effects are not acute, they see the short-term potential benefits as outweighing the long-term negative consequences.
I was hoping to attach some links that discuss possible reasons for an inability to renounce this belief, but not many writers expand their discussion to this. I was also searching for statistical figures that show the frequencies of these beliefs, especially across different social/ethnic groups, which could help in the narrowing down to find the most likely reasons. Below is a link that includes such figures, and shows that the main group who employs their use is those of white ethnicity. Although the statistics on their use may be in circulation, strong conclusions on the ways to eradicate the false notions have yet to be drawn.
